Table 8 Performance comparison of Sequential, Lock-Based, TVar and TArray Sugarscape implementations with varying agent numbers and 50 × 50 environment on 4 cores (except Sequential)
From: A tale of lock-free agents: towards Software Transactional Memory in parallel Agent-Based Simulation
Agents | Sequential | Lock-Based | TVar | TArray |
|---|---|---|---|---|
500 | 70.1 (0.41) | 67.9 (0.13) | 69.1 (0.34) | 25.7 (0.42) |
1000 | 145.0 (0.11) | 130.0 (0.28) | 136.0 (0.16) | 38.8 (1.43) |
1500 | 220.0 (0.14) | 183.0 (0.83) | 192.0 (0.73) | 40.1 (0.25) |
2000 | 213.0 (0.69) | 181.0 (0.84) | 214.0 (0.53) | 49.9 (0.82) |
2500 | 193.0 (0.16) | 272.0 (0.81) | 147.0 (0.32) | 55.2 (1.04) |